📋 AI Product Documentation Submission Guide for Vendors

You've been invited to complete an AI Product Documentation submission as part of a vendor assessment or procurement process. This guide will walk you through everything you need to know to successfully complete your documentation and demonstrate your AI solution's compliance with industry standards.
​

An AI Product Documentation is a standardized framework used to evaluate the transparency, safety, and compliance characteristics of AI systems. Think of it as a comprehensive questionnaire that helps organizations understand how your AI solution addresses critical governance areas like bias mitigation, performance validation, risk management, and regulatory compliance. These documentation standards ensure consistent evaluation across different vendors and AI solutions, making it easier for healthcare organizations and other enterprises to make informed procurement decisions.
​

The documentation request you're completing follows established industry standards that have been developed by leading healthcare and AI organizations. This standardized approach means that the effort you put into completing one documentation template can often be leveraged for future vendor assessments, as many organizations are adopting similar frameworks for AI governance evaluation.
​

If you're submitting for a healthcare organization, you may encounter the ONC HTI-1 standard, which focuses specifically on healthcare AI transparency requirements. This framework emphasizes clinical decision support transparency, ensuring that healthcare providers understand how your AI system reaches its conclusions. It also addresses algorithm bias and fairness assessment, particularly important in healthcare settings where equitable treatment is paramount. Performance validation in healthcare settings and patient safety considerations are core components that demonstrate your solution's readiness for clinical environments.
​

The CHAI standard represents a comprehensive approach to AI governance that extends beyond healthcare-specific requirements. This framework, backed by prestigious institutions like Duke Health, Johns Hopkins University, Stanford Department of Medicine, Microsoft, AWS, OpenAI, Mayo Clinic, Kaiser Permanente, and Cleveland Clinic, establishes rigorous standards for AI trustworthiness and reliability. The CHAI framework covers safety and effectiveness validation through systematic testing and validation processes, bias mitigation and fairness evaluation to ensure equitable outcomes, and transparency and explainability requirements that enable stakeholders to understand and trust AI decision-making processes.
​

Some organizations may ask you to complete custom documentation requests that combine established standards with their own specific requirements. These might include additional questions about commercial activities, industry-specific compliance needs, or internal policies that go beyond standard frameworks. While these custom documentation requests may seem more complex, they often build upon the same fundamental principles found in ONC HTI-1 and CHAI standards.
​

Before you begin your product documentation submission, take time to collect relevant documentation and information about your AI solution. You'll likely need technical documentation that describes your AI model's architecture, training data, and performance characteristics. Prepare validation studies or test results that demonstrate your solution's effectiveness and safety in real-world scenarios. Bias assessment reports and fairness evaluations are increasingly important, so gather any analysis you've conducted on algorithmic fairness and bias mitigation strategies.

Risk assessment documentation is another crucial component, including any analysis of potential harms, failure modes, or unintended consequences of your AI system. If your solution is used in regulated industries like healthcare or finance, compile relevant compliance documentation that demonstrates adherence to sector-specific requirements. Finally, prepare clear explanations of your AI system's decision-making processes, as transparency and explainability are fundamental requirements across most governance frameworks.
​

Completing a comprehensive documentation submission often requires input from multiple team members across your organization. Your technical team can provide detailed information about model architecture, performance metrics, and validation methodologies. Product managers can speak to use cases, deployment scenarios, and user experience considerations. Compliance and legal teams may need to weigh in on regulatory adherence and risk assessments. Quality assurance teams can provide testing results and validation evidence.

Don't hesitate to collaborate across departments to ensure your submission is complete and accurate. Many organizations find it helpful to designate a single point person to coordinate the submission while gathering input from relevant subject matter experts.
​

When completing your documentation, prioritize clarity and specificity in your responses. Avoid generic or vague answers that don't provide meaningful insight into your AI solution's characteristics. Instead, provide concrete examples, specific metrics, and detailed explanations that demonstrate your commitment to responsible AI development and deployment.
​

Be honest about limitations or areas for improvement in your AI system. Organizations appreciate transparency about current capabilities and ongoing improvement efforts rather than overstatements that may create unrealistic expectations. If certain questions don't apply to your AI solution, explain why rather than leaving responses blank or providing irrelevant information.
​

Whenever possible, support your documentation responses with concrete evidence. This might include performance benchmarks, validation study results, bias assessment reports, or compliance certifications. If you reference external standards or frameworks your solution follows, provide specific details about which requirements you meet and how you demonstrate compliance.

Consider including links to publicly available documentation, white papers, or case studies that provide additional context for your responses. However, be mindful of confidential or proprietary information, and only share what you're comfortable making available to the requesting organization.
​

Structure your responses to address both what your AI system does and how it does it. For example, rather than simply stating that your solution "addresses bias," explain the specific methods you use to detect, measure, and mitigate bias throughout the AI lifecycle. Describe your testing methodologies, validation approaches, and ongoing monitoring practices.

Use concrete examples and scenarios to illustrate your points. If your AI solution is used in healthcare, describe specific clinical use cases and how your governance practices ensure patient safety. If you serve financial services, explain how your risk management approaches protect against discriminatory outcomes in lending or underwriting decisions.
​
​

Most documentation submissions have specific deadlines, so plan accordingly to ensure you have adequate time for thorough completion. Start by reviewing all questions and requirements to understand the scope of information needed. Create an internal timeline that allows for information gathering, team collaboration, review cycles, and final submission preparation.

If you encounter questions that require significant research or documentation development, don't wait until the last minute to address these items. Reach out to the requesting organization if you need clarification on specific requirements or if you anticipate challenges meeting the submission deadline.
​

After submitting your documentation, be prepared for potential follow-up questions or requests for additional information. The requesting organization may need clarification on specific responses or additional evidence to support their evaluation process. Treat these follow-up requests as opportunities to provide even more compelling evidence of your AI solution's governance practices.

Maintain open communication throughout the evaluation process and respond promptly to any requests for additional information. This responsiveness demonstrates your commitment to transparency and partnership, which are often as important as the technical capabilities of your AI solution.
​

If you encounter challenges while completing your documentation submission, don't hesitate to reach out for support. Most organizations provide contact information for questions about the submission process, specific requirements, or technical difficulties with the submission platform.

When reaching out for help, be specific about the challenges you're facing and provide context about your AI solution and use cases. This specificity helps support teams provide more targeted and useful guidance. If you're unsure about how to interpret a particular question or requirement, ask for clarification rather than guessing at the intended meaning.
​

Consider leveraging publicly available resources about AI governance and transparency to strengthen your submission. The CHAI organization provides extensive guidance on AI governance best practices that can help you understand expectations and requirements. Industry associations and standards organizations often publish frameworks and guidelines that can inform your approach to AI governance and transparency.
​

Many vendors find it helpful to review example implementations or case studies from other organizations that have successfully implemented AI governance practices. While you shouldn't copy approaches wholesale, these examples can provide inspiration and practical ideas for your own governance initiatives.

Remember that completing an AI product documentation is not just about meeting a vendor requirement – it's an opportunity to demonstrate your organization's commitment to responsible AI development and deployment. The time and effort you invest in this process reflects your dedication to building trustworthy AI solutions that serve users and society effectively. 🌟

Need additional support with your documentation submission? Contact the requesting organization directly or refer to the specific submission guidelines provided with your documentation request invitation.